Videos - Asynchronous Prelim
Videos submitted by competitors by Wednesday March 19th will be published at this site. The Center for Teaching and Learning will work their magic and organize the submissions for your viewing pleasure.
If you have registered for the Asynchronous Preliminary Teach-Off event, you will receive a reminder email when the videos are ready to be viewed and before the final voting deadline.
How-To's for voting on these videos will be made available on this site as well!
Reminders:
- watch all videos
- videos should not be republished or recorded for any reason
- sharing of this site to other KSU colleagues is HIGHLY ENCOURAGED
- criteria for voting will be published mid-January
- food & drinks can be consumed as makes you comfortable
- top videos will be viewed during the in-person Championship on April 11th with a final round of voting to award the Asynchronous Teach-Off Champion!
Rubric for Voting
| 3 points | 2 points | 1 point | |
| Pacing | Well-paced throughout, no rushing or dragging. | Mostly well-paced, with minor rushing or pauses. | Poor pacing, rushed at the end or imbalanced time to cover all required elements (what, why, hints). |
| Clarity and Relevance | Practice and connection to student learning was explained clearly. | Explanation and connect were mostly learn. | Practice was unclear, overly complicated, or lacked a connection to student learning. |
| Potential for Success in Other Courses | Highly adaptable and beneficial for a variety of courses. | Moderate potential for adaptation in a variety of courses. | Difficult to see how this practice could work outside the presenter's context. |
| Inspiration & Reflection | Sparked new ideas or caused me to reflect in new ways in my own teaching. | Mildly thought-provoking rather than inspiring deeper reflection on teaching. | Did not prompt reflection or inspire. |
| Delivery & Engagement | Delivered with enthusiasm and confidence, engaging throughout. | Delivery was solid but could have been more dynamic. | Delivery was unenthusiastic. |
Viewers will provide 1, 2, or 3s for each criteria (for each presenter). They will than rank all of the presentations they viewed during that session. These votes will be submitted via Qualtrics, tallied and the winner from each prelim round will move on to the finale. Videos with highest ranking as of April 10th will also move on to the finale.
